Some startup businesses believe they can “fly below the radar” to take market share (or build a new category) gradually, escaping the attention of the “big guys” who might crush them.
It was always a delusion, but even more so in an age of high-velocity information. Your small successes may only serve as a laboratory for others to capitalize on. Those “inattentive” big guys (Apple/Toyota/General Foods/WalMart/Chase/Caterpillar/whoever) are not asleep, and neither are new competitors who might observe, adapt, improve your model and market aggressively.
So, if you’re undercapitalized, are you doomed?
Not always. You have two viable options: erect higher barriers to entry (e.g., patent protection, or unique brand messaging), or acquire more capital so you can act quickly to build a big user base. Either option moves you toward owning the category. Of course, you should do both if possible. Timid gradualism won’t cut it – as the Sopranos used to say, “come heavy or don’t come at all.”
1. Raising capital is hard. 2. Elevating a brand is hard. We know little about #1, but we’re good at #2. Call us.
Comments 2
Bob,
I agree, there is no more ‘below the radar.’ Transparency is the ‘new normal’ (there’s a new oxymoron for you) but there is one trade-off that can help, depending on the category in which you’re competing.
If the category, for example, is not dependent on technological change, then it may be that you can attempt to trade budget off for time. Expect to take a lot more time to build the business – but you’ll be substituting time for money.
However, since time often is money, the ‘savings’ may be illusory.
Speed kills….usually the slow mover