Adapt

January 27, 2014

Waste circulation, and why the dictator’s widow’s offer makes sense

A client today asked, “Why wouldn’t a marketer want the broadest possible distribution for their material?”

It’s certainly a legitimate question. Observe how many marketers dream and scheme to have their message go viral. Wouldn’t we all want our brand to be tomorrow’s water cooler topic? Pharrell Williams wore a preposterous Dudley Do-right hat to the Grammy Awards Sunday night, and Arby’s tweeted that they wanted their hat back. Water cooler gold, baby.Waste circulation

That tweet was a welcome boost for Arby’s, whose audience (people who’ve never tasted real food) is a large and omnipresent tribe. 100,000,000 Americans at least, we’d guess. The potential market for your product or service is likely not as massive or geographically dispersed.

In the absence of a viral magic moment, reaching large numbers of people requires large buckets of money. So most brands wisely avoid the great budget drain: waste circulation. Your budget is finite; fish where the fish are. The more you truly understand the bullseye of your target, the more efficient your messaging. Demographics are crucial, of course: gender, age, location, ethnicity, income – put your knowledge to work to avoid the “never-gonnas” who will waste your time and budget. But you should also study psychographics: attitudes, aspirations, self-definitions, priorities.

Which brings us to the Nigerian dictator’s widow.

You’ve seen it many times: a spam email from a “distressed” person (always portrayed as a female BTW) who begs your help to transfer a massive amount of money. You (lucky, lucky you) can come to the rescue, in a way that seems only slightly larcenous. The story, spun out, makes you an offer that nets just under ten million dollars. Something for nothing; please respond.

Almost all of us dismiss the scam without a second thought, of course. But there are documented cases of some gullible soul who lost his life savings, if not his life, stepping into the obvious trap, buying a plane ticket to Lagos. A banker friend reports that a customer (presumably one who drives cars, votes and handles sharp objects) will come into the bank every few months, clutching a printout, asking if this email could be real. At least they are dimly aware they should ask.

“How could anyone be that stupid?” is the question most often asked – but far more interesting is “Why is the setup so obviously ridiculous?”

The answer again is waste circulation.

The scam is so childishly absurd that 99.999% of us ignore it. And that’s the point. If the scammer sends out this bait to say, five million people, and only one in a million is idiotic enough to believe it, voila! Five suckers, ready to be fleeced. If the “deal” was slightly more plausible, such as a promise of $4000 instead of $10,000,000, they might have dozens or even hundreds of tire-kickers to sift through to get to the genuine morons.

The scammer’s arithmetic favors an offer that’s laughably dumb, but your arithmetic favors focused customer insight.
Let’s talk about it.

Evolve